Aave vs EVAA Protocol

How Aave vs EVAA Protocol compare on our ratings, lending protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.

Aave4.0/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.0/53.5/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security & track record3.53.5
Rates3.53.5
Market depth5.03.0
Ease of use3.54.0
Decentralization4.53.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Lending modelPooledPooled
ChainsEthereum, Base, Arbitrum, Avalanche, BNB Chain, OtherTON
Main collateral assetsUSDC, USDT, WETH, wBTC, LINK, wstETH, cbBTC, GHO, AAVE, ETH-correlated assetsTON, tsTON, GRAM, USDT
Flash loans YesNot disclosed
Permissionless markets NoNot disclosed
Audited Yes Yes
Bug bounty Yes Yes
Governance tokenAAVEEVAA
Isolated markets Yes Yes
Real-world-asset collateral YesNot disclosed
Own stablecoin Yes No
RatesVariableVariable
Company
Founded20172023
HeadquartersFinlandCzech Republic
InvestorsBlockchain Capital, Framework Ventures, Standard CryptoAnimoca Ventures, CMT Digital, Mythos Ventures, Polymorphic Capital +2
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • $18.006B combined TVL in October 2026
  • Operates across 23 blockchain networks
  • Non-custodial wallet-based access
  • V3 includes Isolation Mode and Efficiency Mode
  • Native Telegram integration eliminates the need for separate desktop browser extensions
  • Smart contracts audited by Trail of Bits and Quantstamp with a HackenProof bounty
  • No KYC requirements for lending or borrowing on the protocol
  • Raised $2.5M from notable ecosystem funds including TON Ventures and Animoca Ventures
Cons
  • Variable borrowing rates can rise with market utilisation
  • Liquidation can sell collateral after health-factor deterioration
  • Smart contract and oracle risks remain
  • Collateral depends on external bridges and asset issuers
  • Restricted entirely to the TON ecosystem with no multichain deployments
  • Variable borrowing interest rates can spike sharply during high pool utilization
  • Borrowers face automatic liquidation risks during market volatility or oracle failures
Best forMulti-chain DeFi borrowers, Collateralised crypto lending, Stablecoin liquidity strategiesTON ecosystem yield seekers, Telegram-native DeFi users, Overcollateralized crypto borrowers

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.