CryptoReview
Submit listing

1inch Wallet vs Passkeys Wallet

How 1inch Wallet vs Passkeys Wallet compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

1inch Wallet4.3/5
VS
Passkeys Wallet3.9/5
Feature
1inch WalletVisit
Passkeys WalletVisit
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.9/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.04.0
Ease of use4.54.5
Chain support4.54.5
Features4.53.5
Privacy4.03.0
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobileWeb, MPC
CustodySelf-custodialMPC (shared)
ChainsEthereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Optimism, Arbitrum, Base, Avalanche, Solana, OtherBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Other
PlatformsiOS, AndroidiOS, Android, Chrome, Firefox, Brave, Safari, Windows, macOS
Hardware wallet support YesNot disclosed
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Staking YesNot disclosed
Buy crypto in appNot disclosed Yes
WalletConnect YesNot disclosed
Security featuresMEV protection, Encrypted file backup, Cloud backup, Hardware wallet integrationBiometric authentication, Multi-party computation, Spending limits, Seedless backup, Client-side key decryption
Recovery without a seed phrase No Yes
Passkey loginNot disclosed Yes
Built-in dApp browser Yes No
Company
Founded20192024
Headquarters—United States
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Native swaps across 18+ blockchains without routing through third-party bridges
  • Self-custodial architecture requiring no identity verification or KYC
  • Zero gas fees available on supported swap modes
  • Hardware wallet pairing supported through Ledger devices
  • Eliminates seed phrases in favor of biometric login
  • Supports Bitcoin, Solana, and multiple Layer 2 networks in one interface
  • No browser extension installation required for dApp interactions
  • Private key export allows users to migrate keys to other compatible wallets
Cons
  • No native desktop application available
  • March 2025 exploit on an outdated Fusion parser drained $5 million from resolvers
  • Unbacked private keys cannot be recovered if device access is lost
  • Windows Hello requires manual QR scanning to back up keys across devices
  • Fiat on-ramps require third-party KYC verification depending on jurisdiction
  • Relies on Exodus multi-party computation infrastructure to coordinate signatures
  • Transaction signing depends on device browser and WebAuthn platform support
Best forActive multichain DeFi traders, Mobile users swapping across networks, Traders wanting integrated MEV protectionDevelopers embedding multichain web3 onboarding, Users avoiding seed-phrase management, Applications targeting mobile web traffic

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.