1inch Wallet vs Monerujo

How 1inch Wallet vs Monerujo compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/53.5/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.04.0
Ease of use4.53.5
Chain support4.51.5
Features4.53.5
Privacy4.04.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobileMobile
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Optimism, Arbitrum, Base, Avalanche, Solana, OtherOther
PlatformsiOS, AndroidAndroid
Open sourceNot disclosed Yes
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Staking Yes No
NFT supportNot disclosed No
Buy crypto in appNot disclosed No
WalletConnect Yes No
Security featuresMEV protection, Encrypted file backup, Cloud backup, Hardware wallet integrationStreet Mode, CrAzYpass, CeasarSeed offset passphrases, PocketChange UTXO management, Background Lock, Sidekick offline companion
Recovery without a seed phrase No No
Passkey loginNot disclosed No
Built-in dApp browser Yes No
Perpetuals tradingNot disclosed No
Company
Founded20192017
Headquarters——
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Native swaps across 18+ blockchains without routing through third-party bridges
  • Self-custodial architecture requiring no identity verification or KYC
  • Zero gas fees available on supported swap modes
  • Hardware wallet pairing supported through Ledger devices
  • Open-source code published under the Apache-2.0 license since 2017
  • Self-custodial storage keeps private keys on device with zero required user registration
  • Air-gapped companion phone signing via Bluetooth using the Sidekick app
  • Connects directly to self-hosted Monero nodes without intermediary servers
Cons
  • No native desktop application available
  • March 2025 exploit on an outdated Fusion parser drained $5 million from resolvers
  • Unbacked private keys cannot be recovered if device access is lost
  • Exclusive to Android, with no official iOS or desktop applications
  • Supports only Monero, excluding other blockchains and multi-asset management
  • Built-in token swaps depend on third-party provider Exolix and its pricing spreads
  • Connecting to public remote nodes leaks metadata if self-hosted nodes are not used
Best forActive multichain DeFi traders, Mobile users swapping across networks, Traders wanting integrated MEV protectionAndroid users holding Monero, Monero users needing air-gapped signing, Privacy-focused mobile transactors

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.