CryptoReview
Submit listing

1inch Wallet vs Bitamp

How 1inch Wallet vs Bitamp compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

1inch Wallet4.3/5
VS
Bitamp2.9/5
Feature
1inch WalletVisit
BitampVisit
Ratings
Our score4.3/52.9/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.03.0
Ease of use4.54.0
Chain support4.51.0
Features4.52.0
Privacy4.04.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobileWeb
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereum, BNB Chain, Polygon, Optimism, Arbitrum, Base, Avalanche, Solana, OtherBitcoin
PlatformsiOS, AndroidChrome, Firefox, Brave, Edge, Safari
Open sourceNot disclosed Yes
Hardware wallet support Yes No
In-app swaps Yes No
Staking Yes No
NFT supportNot disclosed No
Buy crypto in appNot disclosed No
WalletConnect Yes No
Security featuresMEV protection, Encrypted file backup, Cloud backup, Hardware wallet integrationClient-side encryption, Tor network access, Seed phrase compatibility
Recovery without a seed phrase No No
Passkey loginNot disclosed No
MultisigNot disclosed No
Built-in dApp browser Yes No
Perpetuals tradingNot disclosed No
Company
Founded2019—
Headquarters——
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Native swaps across 18+ blockchains without routing through third-party bridges
  • Self-custodial architecture requiring no identity verification or KYC
  • Zero gas fees available on supported swap modes
  • Hardware wallet pairing supported through Ledger devices
  • No account creation, email registration, or KYC verification required
  • Client-side architecture keeps private keys inside the local browser session
  • Free software with zero platform fees, relying only on donations
  • Backwards compatible with seed phrases from Trezor, Ledger, and Electrum
Cons
  • No native desktop application available
  • March 2025 exploit on an outdated Fusion parser drained $5 million from resolvers
  • Unbacked private keys cannot be recovered if device access is lost
  • Supports only the Bitcoin network and no other blockchains or tokens
  • Browser environments are susceptible to phishing and malicious web extensions
  • No built-in fiat on-ramp or decentralized swap functionality
  • Lacks direct hardware-wallet USB or Bluetooth signing integration
Best forActive multichain DeFi traders, Mobile users swapping across networks, Traders wanting integrated MEV protectionQuick web-based Bitcoin transactions, Users avoiding KYC verification, Connecting via Tor browser

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.