CryptoReview
Submit listing

ShapeShift vs Zerion

How ShapeShift vs Zerion compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

ShapeShift4.2/5
VS
Zerion3.9/5
Feature
ShapeShiftVisit
ZerionVisit
Ratings
Our score4.2/53.9/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.03.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Chain support4.54.5
Features4.04.5
Privacy4.53.0
Specs
KYC required NoNot disclosed
Wallet typeMobile, WebMobile, Browser extension, Web, Smart contract wallet
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, OtherEthereum
PlatformsiOS, AndroidiOS, Android, Chrome
Open source Yes Yes
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Staking YesNot disclosed
NFT supportNot disclosed Yes
Buy crypto in app YesNot disclosed
WalletConnect YesNot disclosed
Security featuresNot disclosedSelf-custody, Public browser-extension code, Independent audits, Ledger support
Built-in dApp browserNot disclosed Yes
Swap fee0%0.67%
Perpetuals tradingNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded20142016
HeadquartersSwitzerland—
InvestorsEarlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3Alliance, Placeholder, Signum Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Zero platform commission fees charged on decentralized trades
  • No identity verification or KYC required to swap or store funds
  • Covers more than 10,000 assets across 48 native blockchains
  • Direct hardware wallet connectivity for Ledger and Tangem devices
  • Self-custodial wallet with Ledger support
  • 66-chain coverage includes EVM networks and Solana
  • Browser extension source code is public
  • No Zerion fee for sending or receiving crypto
Cons
  • Third-party routing protocols and automated market makers impose variable swap fees and spreads
  • Cross-chain execution risks depend entirely on third-party bridge and DEX contract security
  • Users bear total responsibility for managing unassisted seed-phrase recovery
  • Trustpilot average rating stood at 3.0 out of 5 in March 2026
  • Built-in swaps and bridges charge a 0.67% service fee
  • Seed-phrase loss and phishing remain self-custody risks
  • Perps and tokenized assets add product and counterparty exposure
  • A phishing incident involving $100,000 was recorded on April 14, 2026
Best forKYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration usersMultichain portfolio management, EVM and Solana users, Ledger users managing DeFi positions

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.