Rocket Pool vs StakeWise

How Rocket Pool vs StakeWise compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/53.7/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Yield3.53.5
Security4.54.0
Liquidity4.03.0
Decentralization5.04.5
Ease of use4.03.5
Specs
KYC required No No
TypeLiquid stakingLiquid staking
Stakeable assetsETHETH
Receipt tokenrETHosETH
Protocol fee14%Not disclosed
Minimum stake0.01 ETHNot disclosed
Withdrawal timeInstant via deposit pool bufferNot disclosed
ChainsEthereumEthereum
Node operatorsPermissionlessDecentralized operator vaults with DVT support
Audited Yes Yes
Restaking NoNot disclosed
Slashing cover YesNot disclosed
Typical reward rate2.0-2.2%Not disclosed
Company
Founded20162018
Headquarters—Estonia
InvestorsCoinbase Ventures, Consensys, 1kxGreenfield Capital, Collider Ventures, Lionschain Capital, gumi Cryptos Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Permissionless node operator set with over 1,400 independent operators
  • Low minimum liquid deposit of 0.01 ETH with no identity checks
  • Requires only 4 ETH validator bonds instead of standard 32 ETH solo stakes
  • Extensively audited by firms including Sigma Prime, Consensys Diligence, and Trail of Bits
  • Over $917M in TVL across Ethereum and Gnosis as of October 2026
  • Choice of independent solo or professional node operator vaults
  • Supports Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) for resilient validation
  • No protocol fee charged on StakeWise Boost leveraged staking
Cons
  • Lower published staking yields than some larger centralized competitors
  • Redemptions directly from the protocol depend on available deposit pool buffer liquidity
  • Stakers remain exposed to potential node operator slashing penalties and contract bugs
  • Staking fees vary by vault operator rather than a single fixed rate
  • Leveraged StakeWise Boost positions carry liquidation risk at 95% LTV
  • Liquid token osETH subject to secondary market depeg risks
  • Staking support restricted to Ethereum and Gnosis Chain assets
Best forDecentralization-focused Ethereum stakers, Home node operators with under 32 ETH, DeFi users needing yield-bearing collateralEthereum stakers choosing specific operators, DeFi users seeking osETH liquidity, Solo stakers running personal vaults

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons