Rocket Pool vs stakefish

Rocket Pool4.2/5

VS

stakefish3.6/5

Feature	Rocket PoolVisit	stakefishVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.2/5	3.6/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Yield	3.5	3.5
Security	4.5	4.5
Liquidity	4.0	2.0
Decentralization	5.0	3.5
Ease of use	4.0	4.0
Specs
KYC required	No	No
Type	Liquid staking	Native staking, Restaking
Stakeable assets	ETH	ETH, SOL, ADA, ATOM, POL, SUI
Receipt token	rETH	Not disclosed
Protocol fee	14%	4.3%
Minimum stake	0.01 ETH	Not disclosed
Withdrawal time	Instant via deposit pool buffer	Not disclosed
Chains	Ethereum	Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Cosmos, Sui, Other
Node operators	Permissionless	stakefish internal infrastructure
Audited	Yes	Yes
Restaking	No	Yes
Slashing cover	Yes	Not disclosed
Typical reward rate	2.0-2.2%	~6-7% APR on Solana
Company
Founded	2016	2018
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Coinbase Ventures, Consensys, 1kx	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Permissionless node operator set with over 1,400 independent operators Low minimum liquid deposit of 0.01 ETH with no identity checks Requires only 4 ETH validator bonds instead of standard 32 ETH solo stakes Extensively audited by firms including Sigma Prime, Consensys Diligence, and Trail of Bits	Zero percent consensus layer fee for native Ethereum validator deposits Non-custodial architecture keeps private keys and withdrawal authority with delegators Runtime Verification audit completed on the Ethereum batch deposit smart contract Track record spanning over eight years without recorded slashing incidents
Cons	Lower published staking yields than some larger centralized competitors Redemptions directly from the protocol depend on available deposit pool buffer liquidity Stakers remain exposed to potential node operator slashing penalties and contract bugs	Fifty percent execution layer fee reduces upside on large Ethereum MEV blocks Native Ethereum staking requires a full 32 ETH capital commitment Does not issue an in-house liquid staking receipt token for secondary market trading Unstaking speeds remain subject to protocol-level network unbonding queues
Best for	Decentralization-focused Ethereum stakers, Home node operators with under 32 ETH, DeFi users needing yield-bearing collateral	Institutional stakers running full validators, Long-term holders seeking non-custodial delegation, Developers integrating multi-chain staking APIs

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons