Polymarket vs Polymarket US

How Polymarket vs Polymarket US compare on our ratings, prediction market specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.0/54.1/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Market selection4.54.5
Liquidity4.54.5
Fees3.04.0
Resolution quality4.03.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Specs
Market typesPolitics, Sports, Crypto, Economics, CulturePolitics, Sports, Crypto, Weather
Settles inpUSD, a crypto collateral token backed by USDCUSD
ChainsPolygonOther
Trading feesNot disclosed0% maker fee; taker fees vary by contract type
Resolution sourceUMA Optimistic OracleSettlement Committee and centralized exchange reports
Available in the US No Yes
KYC requiredNot disclosed Yes
Regulated venue No Yes
Market topicsPolitics, Elections, Sports, Crypto, Finance, Geopolitics, Technology, Culture, Weather, EconomicsNFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, Tennis, Soccer, US Midterms, Elections, Cryptocurrency, Weather
Mobile appNot disclosed Yes
Liquidity rewards Yes Yes
Company
Founded20202020
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
Investors1789 Capital, Intercontinental Exchange, Founders Fund, General Catalyst +26Founders Fund, Intercontinental Exchange, 1789 Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Broad markets across politics, sports, crypto and current events
  • Non-custodial trading with onchain positions
  • Polygon supports pUSD collateral and ERC-1155 outcome tokens
  • UMA provides a defined challenge process for supported markets
  • CFTC Designated Contract Market status
  • Zero maker trading fees with maker rebates supported by taker fees
  • Combo functionality enables grouping 2 to 10 markets into one trade
  • The broader Polymarket entity has disclosed $2.764B in funding, including a $1B investment from Intercontinental Exchange
Cons
  • International trading is blocked for US residents
  • Country restrictions include the United Kingdom, France, Germany and Japan
  • Thin liquidity can increase entry and exit costs
  • Resolution disputes can delay or change settlement outcomes
  • Strict identity verification required, excluding anonymous trading
  • Restricted exclusively to United States residents
  • Centralized clearing model exposes users to clearinghouse counterparty risk
  • Disputed or unresolvable legs rely on discretionary pricing from an internal Settlement Committee
Best forEvent probability traders, Onchain prediction market users, Politics and sports marketsUS residents trading regulated event contracts, Sports bettors building multi-leg combo positions, Political forecasters following US midterm elections

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons