CryptoReview
Submit listing

Passkeys Wallet vs ShapeShift

How Passkeys Wallet vs ShapeShift compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

Passkeys Wallet3.9/5
VS
ShapeShift4.2/5
Feature
Passkeys WalletVisit
ShapeShiftVisit
Ratings
Our score3.9/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.04.0
Ease of use4.54.0
Chain support4.54.5
Features3.54.0
Privacy3.04.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeWeb, MPCMobile, Web
CustodyMPC (shared)Self-custodial
ChainsBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, OtherEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, Other
PlatformsiOS, Android, Chrome, Firefox, Brave, Safari, Windows, macOSiOS, Android
Open sourceNot disclosed Yes
Hardware wallet supportNot disclosed Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
StakingNot disclosed Yes
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
WalletConnectNot disclosed Yes
Security featuresBiometric authentication, Multi-party computation, Spending limits, Seedless backup, Client-side key decryptionNot disclosed
Recovery without a seed phrase YesNot disclosed
Passkey login YesNot disclosed
Built-in dApp browser NoNot disclosed
Swap feeNot disclosed0%
Company
Founded20242014
HeadquartersUnited StatesSwitzerland
InvestorsNot disclosedEarlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Eliminates seed phrases in favor of biometric login
  • Supports Bitcoin, Solana, and multiple Layer 2 networks in one interface
  • No browser extension installation required for dApp interactions
  • Private key export allows users to migrate keys to other compatible wallets
  • Zero platform commission fees charged on decentralized trades
  • No identity verification or KYC required to swap or store funds
  • Covers more than 10,000 assets across 48 native blockchains
  • Direct hardware wallet connectivity for Ledger and Tangem devices
Cons
  • Windows Hello requires manual QR scanning to back up keys across devices
  • Fiat on-ramps require third-party KYC verification depending on jurisdiction
  • Relies on Exodus multi-party computation infrastructure to coordinate signatures
  • Transaction signing depends on device browser and WebAuthn platform support
  • Third-party routing protocols and automated market makers impose variable swap fees and spreads
  • Cross-chain execution risks depend entirely on third-party bridge and DEX contract security
  • Users bear total responsibility for managing unassisted seed-phrase recovery
  • Trustpilot average rating stood at 3.0 out of 5 in March 2026
Best forDevelopers embedding multichain web3 onboarding, Users avoiding seed-phrase management, Applications targeting mobile web trafficKYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.