Orca vs PancakeSwap

How Orca vs PancakeSwap compare on our ratings, dex specs, funding, pros and cons.

Orca3.6/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.6/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Liquidity & pricing4.54.5
Fees3.03.5
Security4.03.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Chain coverage2.55.0
Specs
KYC requiredNot disclosed No
TypeAMMAMM
ChainsSolana, OtherBNB Chain, Ethereum, Aptos, Base, Arbitrum
Swap feeNot disclosedFees vary by product and pool.
Cross-chain swaps No Yes
Audited Yes Yes
Open source Yes Yes
Governance tokenORCACAKE
Perpetual futuresNot disclosed Yes
Points or rewards programNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded20212020
HeadquartersUnited StatesJapan
InvestorsCoinbase Ventures, Placeholder, Polychain Capital, Solana Ventures +2YZi Labs
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Solana-native AMM with $500B+ cumulative trading volume
  • Concentrated liquidity gives providers control over price ranges
  • Open-source code with 4+ independent security reviews
  • Position simulator shows projected returns before deposits
  • Available across 11+ blockchain networks
  • Non-custodial wallet-based access without KYC
  • Open-source contracts with audits from six security firms
  • About $1.56B locked as of October 17, 2026
Cons
  • Concentrated liquidity can leave positions inactive outside their chosen range
  • Swaps remain exposed to MEV and slippage
  • Long-tail pools can have thin liquidity
  • Pools and vaults carry smart-contract risk
  • Permissionless listings increase counterfeit-token and smart-contract risk
  • Swap fees vary by product, pool and fee tier
  • AMM trades remain exposed to slippage and MEV
  • Cross-chain products add bridge and message-passing risk
Best forSolana token swappers, Concentrated-liquidity providers, Solana yield strategistsMultichain spot traders, BNB Chain liquidity providers, CAKE staking users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons