CryptoReview
Submit listing

OG.com vs Polymarket US

How OG.com vs Polymarket US compare on our ratings, prediction market specs, funding, pros and cons.

OG.com3.9/5
VS
Polymarket US4.1/5
Feature
OG.comVisit
Polymarket USVisit
Ratings
Our score3.9/54.1/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Market selection4.04.5
Liquidity4.04.5
Fees3.04.0
Resolution quality4.53.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Specs
Market typesSports, Politics, Economics, CulturePolitics, Sports, Crypto, Weather
Settles inUSDUSD
ChainsNot disclosedOther
Trading feesNot disclosed0% maker fee; taker fees vary by contract type
Resolution sourceCrypto.com Derivatives North America clearinghouse and official data sourcesSettlement Committee and centralized exchange reports
Available in the US Yes Yes
KYC required Yes Yes
Regulated venue Yes Yes
Market topicsSports, Politics, Economics, Culture, EntertainmentNFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, Tennis, Soccer, US Midterms, Elections, Cryptocurrency, Weather
Mobile app Yes Yes
Liquidity rewardsNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded20262020
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
InvestorsNot disclosedFounders Fund, Intercontinental Exchange, 1789 Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Operates under CFTC DCM and DCO regulatory status in the United States
  • Direct legal access for US residents with domestic regulatory oversight
  • Clear institutional liquidity routing via partnerships with FanDuel and Robinhood
  • Broad selection of regulated sports contracts alongside political and economic markets
  • CFTC Designated Contract Market status
  • Zero maker trading fees with maker rebates supported by taker fees
  • Combo functionality enables grouping 2 to 10 markets into one trade
  • The broader Polymarket entity has disclosed $2.764B in funding, including a $1B investment from Intercontinental Exchange
Cons
  • Requires full KYC verification, preventing pseudonymous trading
  • Centralized custody rather than self-custodial smart contract settlements
  • Subject to strict US derivatives jurisdiction and event approval rules
  • Strict identity verification required, excluding anonymous trading
  • Restricted exclusively to United States residents
  • Centralized clearing model exposes users to clearinghouse counterparty risk
  • Disputed or unresolvable legs rely on discretionary pricing from an internal Settlement Committee
Best forUS residents seeking regulated markets, Traders focusing on sports outcomes, Users avoiding onchain gas feesUS residents trading regulated event contracts, Sports bettors building multi-leg combo positions, Political forecasters following US midterm elections

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.