NMKR vs Stargaze

NMKR3.9/5

VS

Stargaze3.4/5

Feature	NMKRVisit	StargazeVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.9/5	3.4/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Fees	3.5	3.0
Selection	3.5	3.0
Ease of use	4.0	3.5
Creator tools	4.5	4.0
Trust & safety	4.0	3.5
Specs
Chains	Bitcoin, Solana, Aptos, Other	Cosmos
Marketplace fee	3%	Not disclosed
Creator royalties	Enforced	Not disclosed
Focus	Art, Collectibles, Music	Collectibles, Art
Launchpad	Yes	Yes
Aggregates other markets	No	Not disclosed
Mobile app	No	Not disclosed
Token	NMKR	STARS
Zero marketplace fee	No	Not disclosed
Points or rewards program	Not disclosed	Yes
Company
Founded	2021	2021
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	No recurring subscription fees for account maintenance or project hosting Open-source minting studio licensed under the MIT License Supports fully on-chain media storage up to Cardano's 16-kilobyte limit Direct checkout processing with fiat cards, Apple Pay, and Google Pay	Active ecosystem trading denominated natively in ATOM and STARS Integrated launchpad for creating and minting primary collections Uses ICS-721 for cross-chain NFT transfers across IBC
Cons	Minimum minting fee of 2 ADA per token on primary sales Metadata updates and reveals cost 2.25 ADA in credits per asset Requires secondary marketplaces to voluntarily honor creator royalty policies Cardano customer sendback locks 2 ADA per NFT without multisig setup	Trading volume is concentrated in a small group of collections Migration from standalone L1 to Cosmos Hub introduces contract transition risks Exposure to price volatility in STARS and ATOM
Best for	Cardano and Solana NFT creators, Developers needing white-label minting APIs, Projects tokenizing real-world assets	Cosmos NFT collectors, Creators launching IBC collections, Holders trading in ATOM

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons