CryptoReview
Submit listing

Monerujo vs ShapeShift

How Monerujo vs ShapeShift compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

Monerujo3.5/5
VS
ShapeShift4.2/5
Feature
MonerujoVisit
ShapeShiftVisit
Ratings
Our score3.5/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.04.0
Ease of use3.54.0
Chain support1.54.5
Features3.54.0
Privacy4.54.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobileMobile, Web
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsOtherEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, Other
PlatformsAndroidiOS, Android
Open source Yes Yes
Hardware wallet support Yes Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Staking No Yes
NFT support NoNot disclosed
Buy crypto in app No Yes
WalletConnect No Yes
Security featuresStreet Mode, CrAzYpass, CeasarSeed offset passphrases, PocketChange UTXO management, Background Lock, Sidekick offline companionNot disclosed
Recovery without a seed phrase NoNot disclosed
Passkey login NoNot disclosed
Built-in dApp browser NoNot disclosed
Swap feeNot disclosed0%
Perpetuals trading NoNot disclosed
Company
Founded20172014
Headquarters—Switzerland
InvestorsNot disclosedEarlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Open-source code published under the Apache-2.0 license since 2017
  • Self-custodial storage keeps private keys on device with zero required user registration
  • Air-gapped companion phone signing via Bluetooth using the Sidekick app
  • Connects directly to self-hosted Monero nodes without intermediary servers
  • Zero platform commission fees charged on decentralized trades
  • No identity verification or KYC required to swap or store funds
  • Covers more than 10,000 assets across 48 native blockchains
  • Direct hardware wallet connectivity for Ledger and Tangem devices
Cons
  • Exclusive to Android, with no official iOS or desktop applications
  • Supports only Monero, excluding other blockchains and multi-asset management
  • Built-in token swaps depend on third-party provider Exolix and its pricing spreads
  • Connecting to public remote nodes leaks metadata if self-hosted nodes are not used
  • Third-party routing protocols and automated market makers impose variable swap fees and spreads
  • Cross-chain execution risks depend entirely on third-party bridge and DEX contract security
  • Users bear total responsibility for managing unassisted seed-phrase recovery
  • Trustpilot average rating stood at 3.0 out of 5 in March 2026
Best forAndroid users holding Monero, Monero users needing air-gapped signing, Privacy-focused mobile transactorsKYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.