Luxor vs Riot Platforms

How Luxor vs Riot Platforms compare on our ratings, mining company specs, funding, pros and cons.

Luxor4.2/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/53.7/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Track record4.53.5
Costs & fees3.53.0
Transparency4.54.5
Scale & reliability4.55.0
Support4.03.0
Specs
TypeMining pool, Firmware & softwarePublic miner
CoinsNot disclosedBTC
Pool fee2.5% (custom down to 0.7%, 0% with LuxOS)Not disclosed
Payout schemesFPPS, Fixed, UpfrontNot disclosed
Hashrate>40 EH/s44.4 EH/s
Stock tickerNot disclosedRIOT
LocationsUnited StatesCorsicana, Texas, Rockdale, Texas, Paducah, Kentucky
Hardware modelsAntminer S19, Antminer S19 Pro, Antminer Z15 Pro, Whatsminer M50S, Whatsminer M60Not disclosed
Company
Founded2017—
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
InvestorsCMT Digital, Black Creek Digital, Hivemind CapitalMorgan Stanley
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • SOC 1 and SOC 2 compliance verifies security and financial accounting controls
  • Pool fees can be reduced to 0% when paired with LuxOS firmware
  • Upfront payout schemes offer non-dilutive liquidity against future hashrate production
  • Over 40 EH/s in hashrate provides consistent block discovery and payout regularity
  • Operates 44.4 EH/s of self-mining capacity on a 2.0 GW approved power pipeline
  • Controls custom power distribution and switchgear production through in-house engineering subsidiaries
  • Held 11,380 Bitcoin on its balance sheet as of June 30, 2026
  • Diversified revenue with 241 MW of long-term commercial HPC and AI data center contracts
Cons
  • Standard unbundled FPPS pool fee of 2.5% is above market discount averages
  • Grid management and retail power services are restricted to ERCOT and SPP regions
  • Derivatives and fixed contracts involve counterparty credit exposure
  • Upfront payout agreements require strict minimum uptime and delivery commitments
  • Offers no third-party retail hosting, cloud mining, or open pool services
  • Reported a net loss of $237.2 million for the second quarter of 2026
  • Heavy operational concentration in the Texas ERCOT power grid
  • Revenues are exposed to Bitcoin halving cuts and rising network difficulty
Best forCommercial ASIC mining operations, Miners seeking hashprice hedging tools, Data centers managing ERCOT power costsInstitutional equity investors seeking Bitcoin exposure, Enterprise AI firms leasing high-density data centers, Investors tracking industrial crypto infrastructure

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.