Luxor vs Phoenix Group

How Luxor vs Phoenix Group compare on our ratings, mining company specs, funding, pros and cons.

Luxor4.2/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Track record4.54.5
Costs & fees3.53.5
Transparency4.54.5
Scale & reliability4.54.5
Support4.03.0
Specs
TypeMining pool, Firmware & softwarePublic miner, Hosting
CoinsNot disclosedBTC
Pool fee2.5% (custom down to 0.7%, 0% with LuxOS)Not disclosed
Payout schemesFPPS, Fixed, UpfrontNot disclosed
Hashrate>40 EH/s15.9 EH/s
Stock tickerNot disclosedADX: PHX
LocationsUnited StatesUnited Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, United States, Oman, Canada, France
Energy sourcesNot disclosedHydroelectric
Hardware modelsAntminer S19, Antminer S19 Pro, Antminer Z15 Pro, Whatsminer M50S, Whatsminer M60Not disclosed
Company
Founded20172017
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited Arab Emirates
InvestorsCMT Digital, Black Creek Digital, Hivemind CapitalNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • SOC 1 and SOC 2 compliance verifies security and financial accounting controls
  • Pool fees can be reduced to 0% when paired with LuxOS firmware
  • Upfront payout schemes offer non-dilutive liquidity against future hashrate production
  • Over 40 EH/s in hashrate provides consistent block discovery and payout regularity
  • Operates over 550 MW across six sovereign-aligned global markets
  • Reported an efficient mining fleet performance of 18.81 J/TH in Q2 2026
  • Generated 15.9 EH/s in Q4 2025, representing 1.5% of global Bitcoin hashrate
  • Regulated as a publicly traded company on the Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange
Cons
  • Standard unbundled FPPS pool fee of 2.5% is above market discount averages
  • Grid management and retail power services are restricted to ERCOT and SPP regions
  • Derivatives and fixed contracts involve counterparty credit exposure
  • Upfront payout agreements require strict minimum uptime and delivery commitments
  • Revenue remains vulnerable to Bitcoin block reward halvings and difficulty increases
  • Energy prices and supply stability depend on six distinct regulatory regimes
  • No retail hosting or individual consumer mining plans
Best forCommercial ASIC mining operations, Miners seeking hashprice hedging tools, Data centers managing ERCOT power costsInstitutional investors seeking ADX-listed equity, Enterprises needing AI and HPC colocation, Institutions tracking diversified Bitcoin hashrate

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.