Limitless vs Polymarket US

How Limitless vs Polymarket US compare on our ratings, prediction market specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.7/54.1/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Market selection4.04.5
Liquidity3.04.5
Fees4.04.0
Resolution quality3.53.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Specs
Market typesCrypto, Sports, PoliticsPolitics, Sports, Crypto, Weather
Settles inUSDCUSD
ChainsBaseOther
Trading fees0% maker fee, 0.40% AMM fee, 0.40%-3% CLOB taker fee0% maker fee; taker fees vary by contract type
Resolution sourcePyth Network, Chainlink Data Streams, manual resolutionSettlement Committee and centralized exchange reports
Available in the US No Yes
KYC requiredNot disclosed Yes
Regulated venue No Yes
Market topicsCrypto prices, Football, Esports, Finance, Elections, MacroeconomicsNFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, Tennis, Soccer, US Midterms, Elections, Cryptocurrency, Weather
Mobile appNot disclosed Yes
Liquidity rewards Yes Yes
Company
Founded20232020
Headquarters—United States
Investors1Confirmation, Arrington Capital, Coinbase Ventures, F-Prime Capital +10Founders Fund, Intercontinental Exchange, 1789 Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Zero maker fees with a 100% taker rebate on short-duration crypto contracts
  • Fast 5-minute and 15-minute expiries for intraday crypto price speculation
  • Non-custodial on-chain USDC settlement on Base
  • Card deposit support through Crossmint alongside standard Web3 wallets
  • CFTC Designated Contract Market status
  • Zero maker trading fees with maker rebates supported by taker fees
  • Combo functionality enables grouping 2 to 10 markets into one trade
  • The broader Polymarket entity has disclosed $2.764B in funding, including a $1B investment from Intercontinental Exchange
Cons
  • Geoblocked for residents of the United States and several other jurisdictions
  • Sports and political outcomes rely on centralized manual resolution by the team
  • Total value locked was $354,380 on October 16, 2026
  • Taker fees on order book buy orders scale up to 3.0%
  • Strict identity verification required, excluding anonymous trading
  • Restricted exclusively to United States residents
  • Centralized clearing model exposes users to clearinghouse counterparty risk
  • Disputed or unresolvable legs rely on discretionary pricing from an internal Settlement Committee
Best forShort-term crypto price momentum traders, Non-US sports accumulator bettors, Base ecosystem USDC holdersUS residents trading regulated event contracts, Sports bettors building multi-leg combo positions, Political forecasters following US midterm elections

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons