Jupiter Lend vs Lista DAO

Jupiter Lend4.0/5

VS

Lista DAO3.6/5

Feature	Jupiter LendVisit	Lista DAOVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.0/5	3.6/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security & track record	4.5	3.5
Rates	4.0	3.5
Market depth	3.5	4.5
Ease of use	4.5	3.5
Decentralization	3.5	3.0
Specs
KYC required	No	No
Lending model	Pooled	CDP
Chains	Solana	BNB Chain, Ethereum
Main collateral assets	Not disclosed	BNB, ETH, slisBNB, wBETH, BTCB, bStocks, XAUt
Permissionless markets	Not disclosed	Yes
Audited	Yes	Yes
Governance token	JUP	LISTA
Real-world-asset collateral	Not disclosed	Yes
Own stablecoin	Not disclosed	Yes
Rates	Variable	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2025	—
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over $1B in total value locked across Solana lending markets Security reviewed by Certora, OtterSec, Neodyme, and Code4rena Requires no KYC or account registration to lend or borrow Native mobile app integration allows managing positions on smartphones	About $969.3 million TVL on October 17, 2026 Supports BNB Chain and Ethereum 89 bStocks listed as collateral across 287 markets Audits include Bailsec and BlockSec in 2025
Cons	Restricted exclusively to the Solana blockchain ecosystem Variable borrowing rates can spike sharply during periods of high utilization Borrowers risk automated liquidation if collateral asset values decline	Variable rates and liquidity differ by lending market Tokenized collateral adds issuer and asset exposure Stablecoin depegs can create liquidation losses A 5% RWA performance fee reduces generated yield
Best for	Solana DeFi yield depositors, Traders borrowing against crypto collateral, Mobile users seeking onchain lending	BNB liquid staking users, Multi-market DeFi borrowers, bStocks collateral users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons