Jupiter Lend vs JustLend DAO

Jupiter Lend4.0/5

VS

JustLend DAO3.5/5

Feature	Jupiter LendVisit	JustLend DAOVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.0/5	3.5/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security & track record	4.5	3.5
Rates	4.0	4.0
Market depth	3.5	3.0
Ease of use	4.5	3.5
Decentralization	3.5	3.5
Specs
KYC required	No	No
Lending model	Pooled	Pooled
Chains	Solana	Tron
Main collateral assets	Not disclosed	ETH, sTRX, TRX, USDT, U
Audited	Yes	Yes
Governance token	JUP	JST
Isolated markets	Not disclosed	Yes
Rates	Variable	Variable
Company
Founded	2025	2020
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over $1B in total value locked across Solana lending markets Security reviewed by Certora, OtterSec, Neodyme, and Code4rena Requires no KYC or account registration to lend or borrow Native mobile app integration allows managing positions on smartphones	Over $3.7B in total value locked on TRON as of October 2026 No identity verification or account registration required to lend or borrow Integrated Energy rentals reduce smart contract execution fees on TRON Isolated market options limit collateral contagion across lending pools
Cons	Restricted exclusively to the Solana blockchain ecosystem Variable borrowing rates can spike sharply during periods of high utilization Borrowers risk automated liquidation if collateral asset values decline	Restricted exclusively to the TRON blockchain ecosystem Floating interest rates can escalate rapidly during market volatility Pooled markets expose depositors to potential bad debt during rapid asset depegs
Best for	Solana DeFi yield depositors, Traders borrowing against crypto collateral, Mobile users seeking onchain lending	TRON token holders seeking yield, Borrowers needing USDT liquidity without KYC, TRC-20 users renting Energy for lower fees

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons