HyperLend vs Jupiter Lend

HyperLend3.6/5

VS

Jupiter Lend4.0/5

Feature	HyperLendVisit	Jupiter LendVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.6/5	4.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Security & track record	3.5	4.5
Rates	4.0	4.0
Market depth	3.5	3.5
Ease of use	4.0	4.5
Decentralization	3.0	3.5
Specs
KYC required	Not disclosed	No
Lending model	Pooled	Pooled
Chains	Hyperliquid	Solana
Main collateral assets	HYPE, kHYPE	Not disclosed
Audited	Yes	Yes
Governance token	HPL	JUP
Rates	Variable	Variable
Company
Founded	—	2025
Headquarters	—	—
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over $325M in total value locked on Hyperliquid EVM Up to 82.7% loan-to-value ratios for correlated HYPE staking positions Single-transaction cross-chain deposits via Across Protocol integration Smart contract audit reports published publicly on GitHub	Over $1B in total value locked across Solana lending markets Security reviewed by Certora, OtterSec, Neodyme, and Code4rena Requires no KYC or account registration to lend or borrow Native mobile app integration allows managing positions on smartphones
Cons	Restricted to the Hyperliquid EVM ecosystem Borrowing interest rates fluctuate dynamically with market utilization Aviya institutional fixed-rate markets are permissioned for approved institutions	Restricted exclusively to the Solana blockchain ecosystem Variable borrowing rates can spike sharply during periods of high utilization Borrowers risk automated liquidation if collateral asset values decline
Best for	Hyperliquid EVM asset holders, HYPE liquid staking loopers, Institutions seeking fixed-rate credit	Solana DeFi yield depositors, Traders borrowing against crypto collateral, Mobile users seeking onchain lending

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons