Gamma vs objkt: Bitcoin Ordinals vs Tezos Art
Gamma and objkt are non-custodial NFT marketplaces built around distinct blockchain ecosystems. Founded in 2021, both platforms let creators mint and trade digital collectibles directly from self-custodial wallets without surrender of private keys.
The fundamental dividing line is network focus and fee structure. Gamma serves the Bitcoin ecosystem, supporting native Bitcoin Ordinals inscriptions and Stacks smart contract NFTs alongside a no-code launchpad. Transactions settle on Bitcoin L1 or Stacks, where transaction expenses track volatile network miner fees. Secondary royalties on Gamma are opt-in for Ordinals.
In contrast, objkt concentrates exclusively on Tezos digital and generative art, aggregating listings from contracts such as Teia. It levies a 5% marketplace fee on trades executed via native contracts, while honoring creator royalties configured between 0% and 25%. Tezos network gas fees remain negligible compared to Bitcoin mining fees, creating a low-cost environment for frequent minting and listing.
Quick verdict
Network architecture and fee dynamics draw a firm line between these platforms. Gamma caters directly to collectors securing digital artifacts on Bitcoin or Stacks, absorbing underlying layer-1 network costs. objkt focuses on Tezos generative art, offering auctions, aggregations, and negligible gas fees paired with a higher 5% native platform fee.
Choose Gamma if you want to trade native Bitcoin Ordinals or Stacks NFTs, plan to mint collections without writing code, and prefer self-custody settlement tied to Bitcoin security.
Choose objkt if you collect Tezos digital art, want an environment where creator royalties reach up to 25%, and seek minimal blockchain transaction costs rather than Bitcoin network fees.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.7/5 | 3.8/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Fees | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Selection | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Creator tools | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Trust & safety | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | Not disclosed |
| Chains | Bitcoin | Other |
| Marketplace fee | Not disclosed | 5% |
| Creator royalties | Optional | Enforced |
| Focus | Ordinals / Inscriptions | Art |
| Launchpad | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Aggregates other markets | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Zero marketplace fee | Not disclosed | No |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | United States | — |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Bitcoin Ordinals collectors, Stacks ecosystem NFT traders, No-code Bitcoin creators | Tezos digital art collectors, Generative art creators, Low-cost NFT minters |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.
FAQ
Which blockchains do Gamma and objkt support?
Gamma supports Bitcoin for Ordinals inscriptions and Stacks for smart contract NFTs. objkt supports only the Tezos blockchain.
How do trading fees compare between Gamma and objkt?
objkt charges a 5% marketplace fee on sales using its native contracts, with no added platform fee on aggregated contracts like Teia. Gamma users pay blockchain network miner fees that vary with Bitcoin and Stacks activity.
How do creator royalties work on each marketplace?
objkt enforces creator royalties between 0% and 25% on secondary sales. Gamma uses an opt-in model for creator royalties on Bitcoin Ordinals.
Do Gamma or objkt require custodial deposits?
Neither marketplace requires deposits into custodial accounts. Both Gamma and objkt execute trades non-custodially directly through supported Web3 crypto wallets.