Foundry vs Phoenix Group
How Foundry vs Phoenix Group compare on our ratings, mining company specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.3/5 | 4.0/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Track record | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Costs & fees | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Transparency | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Scale & reliability | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Support | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Type | Mining pool, Firmware & software | Public miner, Hosting |
| Coins | BTC, ZEC | BTC |
| Pool fee | 0% | Not disclosed |
| Payout schemes | FPPS | Not disclosed |
| Minimum payout | 0.001 BTC | Not disclosed |
| Hashrate | Not disclosed | 15.9 EH/s |
| Stock ticker | Not disclosed | ADX: PHX |
| Locations | United States | United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, United States, Oman, Canada, France |
| Energy sources | Not disclosed | Hydroelectric |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2019 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | United States | United Arab Emirates |
| Investors | Digital Currency Group | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | North American institutional Bitcoin miners, Commercial hosting facility operators, Enterprise entities seeking FPPS payouts | Institutional investors seeking ADX-listed equity, Enterprises needing AI and HPC colocation, Institutions tracking diversified Bitcoin hashrate |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.