For Traders vs FTMO
How For Traders vs FTMO compare on our ratings, prop firm specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.0/5 | 4.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Payout reliability | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Rules & drawdown | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Costs | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Platforms & markets | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Transparency & support | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Evaluation | 1-step, 2-step, Instant funding | 1-step, 2-step, Instant funding |
| Account sizes | $3,000 to $300,000 | Up to $200,000 |
| Challenge fee | From $41 ($50 for Instant Master, $399 for $100K 1-step) | Not disclosed |
| Profit split | Up to 90% (80% standard) | 80% to 90% |
| Daily drawdown limit | Not disclosed | 5% |
| Maximum drawdown | Static balance-based | 10% static |
| Payout frequency | On-demand, weekly, or bi-weekly | Bi-weekly after 14 days |
| Payout methods | Bank transfer, Rise, USDC (ERC20) | Not disclosed |
| Crypto leverage | Not disclosed | Up to 1:100 |
| Trading platforms | MT5, TradeLocker, cTrader, For Traders X | MT4, MT5, TradingView, cTrader |
| Markets | Crypto, Forex, Indices, Commodities | Crypto, Forex, Indices, Commodities, Stocks |
| KYC required | Yes | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | United Arab Emirates | Czech Republic |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Traders seeking static drawdown evaluations, Weekend crypto intraday traders, Traders wanting instant simulated funding | Disciplined day traders avoiding trailing drawdowns, Swing traders using cTrader or TradingView, Forex and crypto technical analysts |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

