Fireblocks vs Kraken Custody
How Fireblocks vs Kraken Custody compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.3/5 | 4.0/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Compliance | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Asset support | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Features | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Support | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Custody model | Qualified custodian, MPC, HSM, Self-custody software | Qualified custodian, MPC, HSM |
| Clients | Institutions, Funds, Corporates | Institutions, Corporates, High-net-worth |
| Regulated | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 report | Yes | Yes |
| Assets supported | Not disclosed | 200 |
| Staking | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Yes |
| Licenses & charters | NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration (US), State money transmitter licenses in 37 states and DC (US) | Wyoming Division of Banking SPDI bank charter (US), Central Bank of Ireland MiCA CASP authorization (Ireland) |
| MPC | Yes | Yes |
| Cold storage | Yes | Yes |
| Qualified custodian | Yes | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | — | 2011 |
| Headquarters | United States | US |
| Investors | D1 Capital Partners, Spark Capital | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Exchanges and payment companies building in-house custody, Funds and RIAs that need a New York qualified custodian, Fintechs launching embedded or white-label wallets | Trading firms that want custody assets to back Kraken Prime credit, Stablecoin issuers and treasury companies that need segregated, bankruptcy-remote reserves, EEA firms that need MiCA-authorized custody from an Irish entity |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

