Fidelity Digital Assets vs Fireblocks

How Fidelity Digital Assets vs Fireblocks compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

Feature
Ratings
Our score3.5/54.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.04.0
Compliance4.54.0
Asset support2.05.0
Features3.04.5
Support3.54.0
Specs
Custody modelQualified custodianQualified custodian, MPC, HSM, Self-custody software
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth, RetailInstitutions, Funds, Corporates
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 report Yes Yes
StakingNot disclosed Yes
API accessNot disclosed Yes
Licenses & chartersOCC national trust bank charter (US), FCA MLR cryptoasset registration (UK)NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration (US), State money transmitter licenses in 37 states and DC (US)
MPCNot disclosed Yes
Cold storage Yes Yes
Qualified custodianNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded2018—
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
InvestorsNot disclosedD1 Capital Partners, Spark Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Custodian is a national trust bank subject to OCC supervision
  • Annual SOC 1 Type II and SOC 2 Type II audits
  • Targets more than 98% of assets in geographically distributed cold storage
  • Trades execute without assets leaving cold storage, with off-exchange settlement for hedge funds
  • Qualified custody through NYDFS-chartered Fireblocks Trust alongside self-custody software
  • Thousands of assets across more than 200 blockchains
  • SOC 2 Type 2 with zero material findings, plus ISO 27001 and CCSS QSP Level 3
  • Air-gapped MPC cold wallet and an HSM option (KeyLink) for banks
Cons
  • Custody and execution listed only for bitcoin, ether and SOL
  • FBTC prospectus says custodian insurance benefits only the custodian
  • Fidelity's own Solana ETF uses outside custodians to hold and stake SOL
  • Key-loss claims from StakeHound and the Celsius plan administrator
  • Licenses are US-only, with no MiCA or other non-US authorization listed
  • Custom plans start at $36,000 a year
Best forRIAs and wealth managers adding bitcoin or ether to client portfolios, Pensions, endowments and corporate treasurers that require a bank-chartered custodian, Hedge funds that want off-exchange settlement while assets stay in cold storageExchanges and payment companies building in-house custody, Funds and RIAs that need a New York qualified custodian, Fintechs launching embedded or white-label wallets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons