Fidelity Digital Assets vs Fireblocks
How Fidelity Digital Assets vs Fireblocks compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.5/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Compliance | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Asset support | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| Features | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| Support | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Custody model | Qualified custodian | Qualified custodian, MPC, HSM, Self-custody software |
| Clients | Institutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth, Retail | Institutions, Funds, Corporates |
| Regulated | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 report | Yes | Yes |
| Staking | Not disclosed | Yes |
| API access | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Licenses & charters | OCC national trust bank charter (US), FCA MLR cryptoasset registration (UK) | NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration (US), State money transmitter licenses in 37 states and DC (US) |
| MPC | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Cold storage | Yes | Yes |
| Qualified custodian | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2018 | — |
| Headquarters | United States | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | D1 Capital Partners, Spark Capital |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | RIAs and wealth managers adding bitcoin or ether to client portfolios, Pensions, endowments and corporate treasurers that require a bank-chartered custodian, Hedge funds that want off-exchange settlement while assets stay in cold storage | Exchanges and payment companies building in-house custody, Funds and RIAs that need a New York qualified custodian, Fintechs launching embedded or white-label wallets |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

