F2Pool vs Foundry
How F2Pool vs Foundry compare on our ratings, mining company specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.9/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Track record | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Costs & fees | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| Transparency | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Scale & reliability | 4.5 | 5.0 |
| Support | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Type | Mining pool | Mining pool, Firmware & software |
| Coins | BTC, BCH, LTC, DOGE, ETC, ETHW, ZEC, SC, DASH, PRL, QTC | BTC, ZEC |
| Pool fee | 1% - 4% | 0% |
| Payout schemes | FPPS, PPS, PPS+, PPLNS | FPPS |
| Minimum payout | 0.005 BTC, 0.02 LTC, 0.01 BCH | 0.001 BTC |
| Hashrate | 170.15 EH/s (BTC) | Not disclosed |
| Locations | Asia, North America, Europe, Africa, Latin America | United States |
| Hardware models | ASIC, GPU | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | — | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Digital Currency Group |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | ASIC operators seeking merged rewards, Large-scale mining farm managers, Multi-coin GPU and Scrypt miners | North American institutional Bitcoin miners, Commercial hosting facility operators, Enterprise entities seeking FPPS payouts |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.