EVAA Protocol vs Jupiter Lend
How EVAA Protocol vs Jupiter Lend compare on our ratings, lending protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.5/5 | 4.0/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security & track record | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Rates | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Market depth | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Decentralization | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | No |
| Lending model | Pooled | Pooled |
| Chains | TON | Solana |
| Main collateral assets | TON, tsTON, GRAM, USDT | Not disclosed |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Bug bounty | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Governance token | EVAA | JUP |
| Isolated markets | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Own stablecoin | No | Not disclosed |
| Rates | Variable | Variable |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Czech Republic | — |
| Investors | Animoca Ventures, CMT Digital, Mythos Ventures, Polymorphic Capital +2 | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | TON ecosystem yield seekers, Telegram-native DeFi users, Overcollateralized crypto borrowers | Solana DeFi yield depositors, Traders borrowing against crypto collateral, Mobile users seeking onchain lending |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

