ether.fi vs Rocket Pool

How ether.fi vs Rocket Pool compare on our ratings, staking protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.0/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Yield4.53.5
Security3.54.5
Liquidity4.54.0
Decentralization3.55.0
Ease of use4.04.0
Specs
KYC required No No
TypeLiquid restakingLiquid staking
Stakeable assetsETHETH
Receipt tokeneETH / weETHrETH
Protocol feeNot disclosed14%
Minimum stakeNot disclosed0.01 ETH
Withdrawal timeNot disclosedInstant via deposit pool buffer
ChainsEthereumEthereum
Node operatorsNot disclosedPermissionless
Audited Yes Yes
Restaking Yes No
Slashing coverNot disclosed Yes
Typical reward rateNot disclosed2.0-2.2%
Company
Founded20232016
Headquarters——
InvestorsBullish, CoinFund, Chapter One, Node Capital +25Coinbase Ventures, Consensys, 1kx
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Over $4.6B in total value locked provides deep secondary market liquidity
  • Users retain control of their withdrawal credentials during validator creation
  • eETH and weETH are widely integrated across major Ethereum Layer 2 rollups
  • Bug bounty program offers payouts up to $500,000 for vulnerability disclosures
  • Permissionless node operator set with over 1,400 independent operators
  • Low minimum liquid deposit of 0.01 ETH with no identity checks
  • Requires only 4 ETH validator bonds instead of standard 32 ETH solo stakes
  • Extensively audited by firms including Sigma Prime, Consensys Diligence, and Trail of Bits
Cons
  • Restaking exposes stakers to compounding multi-layer smart contract and slashing risks
  • October 2026 audit flagged re-entrancy risks in external bridge contracts
  • Unbonding and withdrawal queues depend on underlying Ethereum validator exit times
  • Lower published staking yields than some larger centralized competitors
  • Redemptions directly from the protocol depend on available deposit pool buffer liquidity
  • Stakers remain exposed to potential node operator slashing penalties and contract bugs
Best forEthereum holders seeking layered restaking yield, DeFi users requiring liquid weETH collateral, Stakers wanting card spending optionsDecentralization-focused Ethereum stakers, Home node operators with under 32 ETH, DeFi users needing yield-bearing collateral

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons