DEX Screener vs Santiment

How DEX Screener vs Santiment compare on our ratings, analytics tool specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.5/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Data quality4.54.5
Features4.04.0
Pricing5.03.5
Ease of use4.54.0
Coverage4.54.0
Specs
Tool typeMarket data, DashboardsOn-chain analytics, Market data, Alerts
Free plan Yes Yes
Paid plans from (per month)FreeNot disclosed
Chains covered6013
API access Yes Yes
Alerts Yes Yes
Mobile app YesNot disclosed
Wallet trackingNot disclosed Yes
NFT dataNot disclosed Yes
CSV exportNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded20212016
Headquarters—Switzerland
InvestorsBuckley Ventures, DGF InvestimentosNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Free charting and screening across more than 60 blockchains
  • No account registration or identity verification required
  • Indexes raw blockchain logs directly without relying on external API aggregators
  • Native mobile apps available on Android and iOS
  • Tracks more than 1,100 metrics across 2,500+ crypto assets
  • Labels over 75 million Ethereum and 65 million Bitcoin addresses
  • Combines on-chain metrics with developer activity and social volume data
  • SAN token holders receive a 20% subscription discount
Cons
  • Google Play reviewers report frequent scam tokens and fake volume across listings
  • Paid token boosts and profile placements can promote projects in discovery products
  • Unrestricted real-time API access requires the higher-tier Max subscription
  • Free plan restricts metric history depth and data freshness
  • Monthly subscriptions do not support direct cryptocurrency payments
Best forOn-chain decentralized exchange traders, Tracking newly launched liquidity pools, Multi-chain token price screeningQuantitative crypto market researchers, Traders tracking whale wallet activity, Teams monitoring social sentiment trends

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons