DefiLlama vs Velo Data

How DefiLlama vs Velo Data compare on our ratings, analytics tool specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.6/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Data quality4.54.5
Features4.54.5
Pricing5.03.0
Ease of use4.04.0
Coverage5.04.0
Specs
Tool typeMarket data, DashboardsMarket data, Research, Dashboards, Alerts
Free plan Yes Yes
Chains covered500Not disclosed
API access Yes Yes
AlertsNot disclosed Yes
CSV exportNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded2020—
Headquarters——
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Core analytics dashboards require no login or account creation
  • Tracks more than 500 blockchain ecosystems without paywalls on standard charts
  • LlamaSwap aggregator charges 0% in platform-level routing fees
  • Exploit database detailing over 1,200 DeFi hacks
  • Covers derivatives and spot metrics across more than 3,400 symbols
  • Integrates CME futures and Grayscale premium data alongside crypto exchanges
  • Offers official Python and TypeScript SDKs plus Model Context Protocol support
  • Includes liquidation heatmaps and execution on HyperEVM lending protocols
Cons
  • Dedicated high-volume API access costs $250 per month
  • Community-maintained code contributes to protocol metric calculations
  • Private fundraising records depend on self-reported and voluntary disclosures
  • Full API access requires a $199 monthly subscription
  • Interacting with HyperEVM lending protocols carries smart contract liquidation risk
  • TradFi CME data updates once daily rather than continuously
  • On-chain lending integration is restricted to the HyperEVM network
Best forDeFi researchers tracking protocol revenue, Yield farmers comparing pool APYs, Developers needing free on-chain data APIsCrypto derivatives traders, Quantitative research analysts, Hyperliquid and HyperEVM ecosystem participants

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons