DefiLlama vs Santiment

How DefiLlama vs Santiment compare on our ratings, analytics tool specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.6/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Data quality4.54.5
Features4.54.0
Pricing5.03.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Coverage5.04.0
Specs
Tool typeMarket data, DashboardsOn-chain analytics, Market data, Alerts
Free plan Yes Yes
Chains covered50013
API access Yes Yes
AlertsNot disclosed Yes
Wallet trackingNot disclosed Yes
NFT dataNot disclosed Yes
CSV exportNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded20202016
Headquarters—Switzerland
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Core analytics dashboards require no login or account creation
  • Tracks more than 500 blockchain ecosystems without paywalls on standard charts
  • LlamaSwap aggregator charges 0% in platform-level routing fees
  • Exploit database detailing over 1,200 DeFi hacks
  • Tracks more than 1,100 metrics across 2,500+ crypto assets
  • Labels over 75 million Ethereum and 65 million Bitcoin addresses
  • Combines on-chain metrics with developer activity and social volume data
  • SAN token holders receive a 20% subscription discount
Cons
  • Dedicated high-volume API access costs $250 per month
  • Community-maintained code contributes to protocol metric calculations
  • Private fundraising records depend on self-reported and voluntary disclosures
  • Unrestricted real-time API access requires the higher-tier Max subscription
  • Free plan restricts metric history depth and data freshness
  • Monthly subscriptions do not support direct cryptocurrency payments
Best forDeFi researchers tracking protocol revenue, Yield farmers comparing pool APYs, Developers needing free on-chain data APIsQuantitative crypto market researchers, Traders tracking whale wallet activity, Teams monitoring social sentiment trends

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons