DefiLlama vs Nansen

DefiLlama4.6/5

VS

Nansen4.0/5

Feature	DefiLlamaVisit	NansenVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.6/5	4.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Data quality	4.5	4.5
Features	4.5	4.5
Pricing	5.0	3.0
Ease of use	4.0	4.0
Coverage	5.0	4.0
Specs
Tool type	Market data, Dashboards	On-chain analytics, Wallet tracking, Alerts
Free plan	Yes	Yes
Chains covered	500	Not disclosed
API access	Yes	Yes
Alerts	Not disclosed	Yes
Mobile app	Not disclosed	Yes
Wallet tracking	Not disclosed	Yes
Company
Founded	2020	2019
Headquarters	—	Singapore
Investors	Not disclosed	Accel, Andreessen Horowitz, Fabric Ventures, Robot Ventures
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Core analytics dashboards require no login or account creation Tracks more than 500 blockchain ecosystems without paywalls on standard charts LlamaSwap aggregator charges 0% in platform-level routing fees Exploit database detailing over 1,200 DeFi hacks	Database of over 500 million labeled addresses across major chains Direct non-custodial trading via Privy with Jupiter, OKX, and LI.FI routing Native mobile and web applications with integrated wallet alerts Free plan available alongside advanced Pro subscriptions
Cons	Dedicated high-volume API access costs $250 per month Community-maintained code contributes to protocol metric calculations Private fundraising records depend on self-reported and voluntary disclosures	Key intelligence tools and agent credit caps require paid Pro subscriptions Third-party aggregation exposes trades to DEX pool liquidity and slippage Wallet labels may misinterpret automated transfers as directional trader sentiment
Best for	DeFi researchers tracking protocol revenue, Yield farmers comparing pool APYs, Developers needing free on-chain data APIs	Active onchain spot and perps traders, Crypto researchers tracking fund allocations, Teams analyzing smart money movements

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons