Cropty vs ShapeShift

How Cropty vs ShapeShift compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

Cropty3.7/5
VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.7/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security3.04.0
Ease of use4.54.0
Chain support4.04.5
Features4.54.0
Privacy3.04.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeMobile, Web, Browser extensionMobile, Web
CustodyCustodialSelf-custodial
ChainsBitcoin, Ethereum, BNB Chain, TON, Polygon, Solana, Tron, Avalanche, OtherEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, Other
PlatformsiOS, Android, ChromeiOS, Android
Open source No Yes
Hardware wallet supportNot disclosed Yes
In-app swaps Yes Yes
Staking Yes Yes
Buy crypto in app Yes Yes
WalletConnectNot disclosed Yes
Security features2FA, Cold storage, ISO/IEC 27001, Account recoveryNot disclosed
Recovery without a seed phrase YesNot disclosed
Swap fee0%0%
Perpetuals trading NoNot disclosed
Company
Founded20222014
Headquarters—Switzerland
InvestorsNot disclosedEarlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Zero fees for instant internal transfers between Cropty users
  • Pay network withdrawal fees in USDT or the transferred token instead of native gas
  • Account recovery by email or Telegram avoids reliance on seed phrases
  • Overcollateralized crypto loans let users access liquidity without liquidating assets
  • Zero platform commission fees charged on decentralized trades
  • No identity verification or KYC required to swap or store funds
  • Covers more than 10,000 assets across 48 native blockchains
  • Direct hardware wallet connectivity for Ledger and Tangem devices
Cons
  • Custodial architecture means users do not control their own private keys
  • The core development and executive team remains anonymous
  • Closed-source code prevents public verification of underlying systems
  • Third-party routing protocols and automated market makers impose variable swap fees and spreads
  • Cross-chain execution risks depend entirely on third-party bridge and DEX contract security
  • Users bear total responsibility for managing unassisted seed-phrase recovery
  • Trustpilot average rating stood at 3.0 out of 5 in March 2026
Best forUsers avoiding complex seed phrase management, Frequent transfers between Cropty users, Borrowers needing crypto-backed liquidityKYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.