CoinShares vs Invesco
How CoinShares vs Invesco compare on our ratings, asset manager specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.4/5 | 4.0/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Track record & size | 4.5 | 5.0 |
| Product range | 4.5 | 3.0 |
| Fees | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Regulation & custody | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Transparency | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Products | Spot ETFs, ETPs / ETNs, Index funds, Staking products | Spot ETFs |
| Clients | Retail, Institutions, Financial advisors | Retail, Institutions, Financial advisors |
| Assets under management | $7.4 billion (December 2025) | $2,537.8 billion as of September 30, 2026 |
| Flagship products | CoinShares Physical Bitcoin ETP (BITC), CoinShares Ethereum Staking ETP, CoinShares Solana Staking ETP, CoinShares Altcoins ETF (DIME) | Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF, BTCO |
| Assets covered | Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, Sei | Bitcoin |
| Fees | 0.25% on Physical Bitcoin ETP, 0% management fee on Ethereum Staking ETP, 0.95% gross expense ratio on Altcoins ETF | Not disclosed |
| Regulators | AMF (France), SEC (United States) | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Custodians | Komainu | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2013 | — |
| Headquarters | Jersey | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | European retail and institutional brokerage accounts, Investors seeking regulated spot crypto exposure, Wealth managers allocating to staking ETPs | Brokerage-based bitcoin exposure, Institutional portfolio allocations, Financial adviser-led portfolios |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

