Coinomi vs ShapeShift
How Coinomi vs ShapeShift compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.9/5 | 4.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Chain support | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Features | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Privacy | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | No | No |
| Wallet type | Mobile, Desktop | Mobile, Web |
| Custody | Self-custodial | Self-custodial |
| Chains | Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Tron, Other | Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, Other |
| Platforms | iOS, Android, Windows, macOS, Linux | iOS, Android |
| Open source | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Hardware wallet support | No | Yes |
| In-app swaps | Yes | Yes |
| Staking | Yes | Yes |
| NFT support | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Buy crypto in app | Yes | Yes |
| WalletConnect | Yes | Yes |
| Security features | BIP44 recovery phrase, Local key encryption, IP masking proxy, Custom node connection, UTXO control | Not disclosed |
| Recovery without a seed phrase | No | Not disclosed |
| Passkey login | No | Not disclosed |
| Multisig | No | Not disclosed |
| Built-in dApp browser | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Swap fee | Not disclosed | 0% |
| Perpetuals trading | No | Not disclosed |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2014 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | — | Switzerland |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Earlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3 |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Multi-chain cryptocurrency holders, Users running personal Bitcoin nodes, Cross-platform desktop and mobile traders | KYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration users |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

