CleanSpark vs F2Pool
How CleanSpark vs F2Pool compare on our ratings, mining company specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.2/5 | 3.9/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Track record | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Costs & fees | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Transparency | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Scale & reliability | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Support | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Type | Public miner | Mining pool |
| Coins | BTC | BTC, BCH, LTC, DOGE, ETC, ETHW, ZEC, SC, DASH, PRL, QTC |
| Pool fee | Not disclosed | 1% - 4% |
| Payout schemes | Not disclosed | FPPS, PPS, PPS+, PPLNS |
| Minimum payout | Not disclosed | 0.005 BTC, 0.02 LTC, 0.01 BCH |
| Hashrate | 50 EH/s | 170.15 EH/s (BTC) |
| Stock ticker | CLSK | Not disclosed |
| Locations | Georgia, Mississippi, Tennessee, Wyoming | Asia, North America, Europe, Africa, Latin America |
| Hardware models | Not disclosed | ASIC, GPU |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | United States | — |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Public equity investors seeking Bitcoin mining exposure, Institutional research on industrial Bitcoin data centers, Enterprise clients seeking HPC data center infrastructure | ASIC operators seeking merged rewards, Large-scale mining farm managers, Multi-coin GPU and Scrypt miners |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.