Circle vs Ethena

How Circle vs Ethena compare on our ratings, stablecoin specs, funding, pros and cons.

Circle4.7/5
VS
Ethena3.5/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.7/53.5/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Reserves & transparency5.04.0
Peg stability4.53.5
Regulation5.02.0
Liquidity & chains5.04.5
Redemption4.03.5
Specs
TickersUSDC, EURCUSDe, sUSDe
Pegged toUS dollarUS dollar
BackingCash & treasuriesDelta-neutral (synthetic)
Yield-bearing No Yes
Regulated issuer Yes No
Licenses & chartersUS BitLicense (NYDFS), US FinCEN MSB, France EMI (ACPR / MiCA), UK EMI (FCA), Singapore MPI (MAS), ADGM FSRA FSP, Bermuda Class FNot disclosed
Supply / market cap$72.9B as of October 2026$5.92B
ChainsEthereum, Solana, Avalanche, Base, StellarNot disclosed
Reserve reportsMonthly reserve attestations by Deloitte & Touche, with daily CUSIP-level reporting of the Circle Reserve Fund via BlackRock.Monthly custodian attestations and weekly Proof of Reserves reporting
Redemption terms1:1 par redemption with 0% fees via Circle Mint for verified institutional accounts; retail redemptions via secondary exchanges.Direct mint and redemption restricted to whitelisted users passing KYC/AML; US users prohibited
Issuer can freeze tokens YesNot disclosed
Company
Founded2013—
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsNot disclosedDragonfly Capital Partners, F-Prime Capital, Franklin Templeton, Pantera Capital +1
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Reserves backed 1:1 by cash and short-dated Treasuries with daily CUSIP reporting
  • Monthly reserve attestations published by Deloitte & Touche
  • Direct institutional minting and redemption at 1:1 with zero fees via Circle Mint
  • Holds regulatory licenses in the US, EU, UK, and Singapore
  • Independent SOC 2 Type II audit completed with zero operational exceptions noted
  • Generates organic yield from basis spreads and staked collateral without lending rehypothecation
  • Backing assets remain in institutional custody rather than directly on centralized exchanges
  • Processed more than $30 billion in cumulative mint and redemption volume
Cons
  • Circle has onchain blacklist capabilities to freeze tokens on public addresses
  • Direct fiat redemption requires corporate KYB onboarding through Circle Mint
  • Depegged to $0.87 during the March 2023 Silicon Valley Bank failure
  • Reserves carry counterparty exposure to partner banks holding cash deposits
  • Barred from distribution across the European Union by BaFin under MiCA rules
  • Direct minting and redemptions require KYC and exclude users from the United States
  • Briefly depegged to $0.97 during market stress on October 10, 2025
  • Negative funding rate environments reduce yield and strain the protocol reserve fund
Best forInstitutional cross-border payment settlement, DeFi liquidity providers and traders, European entities needing MiCA complianceOffshore yield seekers holding dollars, DeFi liquidity providers using collateral, Institutional traders managing basis spreads

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.