Centrifuge vs Jupiter Lend
How Centrifuge vs Jupiter Lend compare on our ratings, lending protocol specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.9/5 | 4.0/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security & track record | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Rates | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Market depth | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Ease of use | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Decentralization | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| KYC required | Yes | No |
| Lending model | Isolated markets | Pooled |
| Chains | Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, Other | Solana |
| Main collateral assets | Treasuries, Corporate bonds, CLOs, Credit lines | Not disclosed |
| Permissionless markets | No | Not disclosed |
| Audited | Yes | Yes |
| Governance token | Not disclosed | JUP |
| Isolated markets | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Real-world-asset collateral | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Own stablecoin | No | Not disclosed |
| Rates | Not disclosed | Variable |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2017 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | — | — |
| Investors | BlockTower Capital, Greenfield Capital, ParaFi Capital | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Institutional RWA issuers, DeFi protocols adding RWA collateral, Investors accessing tokenized funds | Solana DeFi yield depositors, Traders borrowing against crypto collateral, Mobile users seeking onchain lending |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.