Cactus Custody vs Fireblocks
How Cactus Custody vs Fireblocks compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.5/5 | 4.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Compliance | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Asset support | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Features | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Support | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Custody model | Not disclosed | Qualified custodian, MPC, HSM, Self-custody software |
| Clients | Institutions, Funds, Corporates, High-net-worth | Institutions, Funds, Corporates |
| Regulated | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 report | Yes | Yes |
| Insurance | OneDegree policy covering the Hong Kong and Bhutan custody entities; Swiss entity cover planned (Sep 2026) | Not disclosed |
| Staking | Not disclosed | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Yes |
| Licenses & charters | Not disclosed | NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration (US), State money transmitter licenses in 37 states and DC (US) |
| MPC | Yes | Yes |
| Cold storage | Yes | Yes |
| Qualified custodian | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | — | — |
| Headquarters | — | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | D1 Capital Partners, Spark Capital |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Asia-based funds and family offices that want custody linked to OTC and lending, Bitcoin miners sending mined BTC straight into custody, Trading firms settling off-exchange with Bitget, Bybit or KuCoin | Exchanges and payment companies building in-house custody, Funds and RIAs that need a New York qualified custodian, Fintechs launching embedded or white-label wallets |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

