Bybit Launchpad vs Jupiter Studio
How Bybit Launchpad vs Jupiter Studio compare on our ratings, launchpad specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.3/5 | 3.3/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Track record of launches | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Project vetting | 3.0 | 1.5 |
| Fairness & access | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Costs | 2.5 | 3.5 |
| Transparency | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Launch types | IDO, IEO | Memecoin launcher, Fair launch |
| Chains | Not disclosed | Solana |
| How allocations work | MNT commitments use a subscription model. USDT commitments use a lottery model. Sales move through Snapshot, Subscription, Distribution and Launch stages. | Dynamic bonding curve via Meteora with open buy and sell orders before graduating to a DAMM v2 liquidity pool |
| Staking needed for allocations | Not disclosed | No |
| KYC required | Yes | No |
| Fees | Not disclosed | 0.0327 SOL mint cost; 1% trading fee per transaction split 50/50 between creator and Jupiter; decaying anti-sniper fee (99% to 0%) |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2021 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | United Arab Emirates | — |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Existing Bybit account holders, MNT holders seeking allocations, Users joining exchange token sales | Solana creators launching tokens without capital, Traders seeking open bonding-curve launches, Users wanting sales without staking tiers |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

