BNY Digital Asset Custody vs Fireblocks

How BNY Digital Asset Custody vs Fireblocks compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

Feature
Ratings
Our score3.2/54.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security3.54.0
Compliance4.04.0
Asset support1.55.0
Features2.54.5
Support4.04.0
Specs
Custody modelQualified custodian, MPCQualified custodian, MPC, HSM, Self-custody software
ClientsInstitutions, Funds, CorporatesInstitutions, Funds, Corporates
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 reportNot disclosed Yes
InsuranceParent-company insurance for events such as theft or fraud, shared across all custody clients; excludes market losses (MSBT prospectus, 2026)Not disclosed
StakingNot disclosed Yes
API accessNot disclosed Yes
Licenses & chartersNYDFS state bank charter, Federal Reserve member (US), NBB MiCA crypto custody notification (Belgium)NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration (US), State money transmitter licenses in 37 states and DC (US)
MPC Yes Yes
Cold storageNot disclosed Yes
Qualified custodian Yes Yes
Company
Founded1784—
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
InvestorsNot disclosedD1 Capital Partners, Spark Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Crypto is held by The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York state-chartered Federal Reserve member bank
  • EU service through BNY SA/NV, listed in ESMA's MiCA register with 30 EEA host countries
  • MPC key management with segregated client wallets
  • Named bitcoin custodian, administrator and transfer agent for the Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust
  • Qualified custody through NYDFS-chartered Fireblocks Trust alongside self-custody software
  • Thousands of assets across more than 200 blockchains
  • SOC 2 Type 2 with zero material findings, plus ISO 27001 and CCSS QSP Level 3
  • Air-gapped MPC cold wallet and an HSM option (KeyLink) for banks
Cons
  • Only four assets: BTC, ETH, SOL and USDC
  • Staking with Galaxy was announced in August 2026 subject to regulatory review
  • The MSBT prospectus lists a SOC 1 Type 1 report as BNY's current audit report
  • MiCA scope in the EU covers custody and transfer only
  • Key-loss claims from StakeHound and the Celsius plan administrator
  • Licenses are US-only, with no MiCA or other non-US authorization listed
  • Custom plans start at $36,000 a year
Best forAsset managers and ETF sponsors that already use BNY for fund services, EU banks and broker-dealers that want a bank custodian listed under MiCA, Corporate treasuries holding bitcoin, ether, Solana or USDCExchanges and payment companies building in-house custody, Funds and RIAs that need a New York qualified custodian, Fintechs launching embedded or white-label wallets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons