Blockchain Transparency Institute vs DefiLlama

How Blockchain Transparency Institute vs DefiLlama compare on our ratings, analytics tool specs, funding, pros and cons.

Feature
Ratings
Our score2.8/54.6/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Data quality3.04.5
Features2.54.5
Pricing4.05.0
Ease of use2.04.0
Coverage2.55.0
Specs
Tool typeResearch, Market dataMarket data, Dashboards
Free planNot disclosed Yes
Chains coveredNot disclosed500
API access Yes Yes
Company
Founded—2020
Headquarters——
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Published over 200 investigative reports on exchange volume manipulation
  • Operated as a non-profit group
  • Core analytics dashboards require no login or account creation
  • Tracks more than 500 blockchain ecosystems without paywalls on standard charts
  • LlamaSwap aggregator charges 0% in platform-level routing fees
  • Exploit database detailing over 1,200 DeFi hacks
Cons
  • Permanently shut down with an inactive website
  • Live market feeds and API endpoints are completely offline
  • Historical rankings cannot reflect present-day trading venues
  • Dedicated high-volume API access costs $250 per month
  • Community-maintained code contributes to protocol metric calculations
  • Private fundraising records depend on self-reported and voluntary disclosures
Best forHistorical market data researchers, Academic studies on wash trading, Archival cryptocurrency compliance reviewsDeFi researchers tracking protocol revenue, Yield farmers comparing pool APYs, Developers needing free on-chain data APIs

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons