Bitpanda Custody vs Fireblocks

How Bitpanda Custody vs Fireblocks compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.

Feature
Ratings
Our score3.6/54.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security3.54.0
Compliance4.04.0
Asset support3.05.0
Features4.04.5
Support3.54.0
Specs
Custody modelQualified custodian, HSM, Self-custody softwareQualified custodian, MPC, HSM, Self-custody software
ClientsNot disclosedInstitutions, Funds, Corporates
Regulated Yes Yes
SOC 2 report Yes Yes
Staking Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Licenses & chartersVARA VASP license for custody services (UAE), FMA MiCA CASP authorization (Austria), BaFin MiCA CASP authorization (Germany), MFSA MiCA CASP authorization (Malta), FCA cryptoasset registration (UK)NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), FinCEN MSB registration (US), State money transmitter licenses in 37 states and DC (US)
MPCNot disclosed Yes
Cold storage Yes Yes
Qualified custodianNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded2018—
Headquarters—United States
InvestorsNot disclosedD1 Capital Partners, Spark Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • VARA custody license in Dubai plus MiCA custody authorizations in Austria, Germany and Malta
  • Keys generated and used only in FIPS 140-2 Level 3 HSMs, with an air-gapped option
  • Same stack available as custodial SaaS or as a non-custodial on-premises install
  • SOC 2 Type II audit and ISO 27001-certified security management
  • Qualified custody through NYDFS-chartered Fireblocks Trust alongside self-custody software
  • Thousands of assets across more than 200 blockchains
  • SOC 2 Type 2 with zero material findings, plus ISO 27001 and CCSS QSP Level 3
  • Air-gapped MPC cold wallet and an HSM option (KeyLink) for banks
Cons
  • Named network support is limited to Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB Smart Chain, XDC and EVM layer 2s
  • HSM-only key model with no MPC signing
  • The contracting entity and license vary with the client's jurisdiction
  • Leadership turnover: the founder left the board in 2025 and the group CEO departs in 2027
  • Key-loss claims from StakeHound and the Celsius plan administrator
  • Licenses are US-only, with no MiCA or other non-US authorization listed
  • Custom plans start at $36,000 a year
Best forBanks and brokers in the EU, UK and UAE that need a licensed custodian, Institutions that want to run HSM signing in their own data centers, Fintechs already using Bitpanda's investment or payments infrastructureExchanges and payment companies building in-house custody, Funds and RIAs that need a New York qualified custodian, Fintechs launching embedded or white-label wallets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons