Bitpanda Custody vs Coinbase Prime
How Bitpanda Custody vs Coinbase Prime compare on our ratings, custodian specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.6/5 | 4.1/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Security | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Compliance | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Asset support | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| Features | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Support | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Custody model | Qualified custodian, HSM, Self-custody software | Not disclosed |
| Regulated | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 report | Yes | Yes |
| Insurance | Not disclosed | Up to $320M commercial crime policy (insurer syndicate), shared by all Coinbase customers |
| Staking | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Yes |
| Licenses & charters | VARA VASP license for custody services (UAE), FMA MiCA CASP authorization (Austria), BaFin MiCA CASP authorization (Germany), MFSA MiCA CASP authorization (Malta), FCA cryptoasset registration (UK) | NYDFS limited purpose trust charter (US), NYDFS BitLicense (US), CSSF MiCA CASP authorization (Luxembourg) |
| Cold storage | Yes | Yes |
| Qualified custodian | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | — | United States |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Banks and brokers in the EU, UK and UAE that need a licensed custodian, Institutions that want to run HSM signing in their own data centers, Fintechs already using Bitpanda's investment or payments infrastructure | Hedge funds that want custody and execution in one account, ETF sponsors and asset managers that need a New York trust company as custodian, Trading desks that route orders over FIX |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

