CryptoReview
Submit listing

Bitamp vs ShapeShift

How Bitamp vs ShapeShift compare on our ratings, wallet specs, funding, pros and cons.

Bitamp2.9/5
VS
ShapeShift4.2/5
Feature
BitampVisit
ShapeShiftVisit
Ratings
Our score2.9/54.2/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security3.04.0
Ease of use4.04.0
Chain support1.04.5
Features2.04.0
Privacy4.54.5
Specs
KYC required No No
Wallet typeWebMobile, Web
CustodySelf-custodialSelf-custodial
ChainsBitcoinEthereum, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Tron, Cosmos, Other
PlatformsChrome, Firefox, Brave, Edge, SafariiOS, Android
Open source Yes Yes
Hardware wallet support No Yes
In-app swaps No Yes
Staking No Yes
NFT support NoNot disclosed
Buy crypto in app No Yes
WalletConnect No Yes
Security featuresClient-side encryption, Tor network access, Seed phrase compatibilityNot disclosed
Recovery without a seed phrase NoNot disclosed
Passkey login NoNot disclosed
Multisig NoNot disclosed
Built-in dApp browser NoNot disclosed
Swap feeNot disclosed0%
Perpetuals trading NoNot disclosed
Company
Founded—2014
Headquarters—Switzerland
InvestorsNot disclosedEarlybird Venture Capital, Access Venture Partners, Blockchain Capital, Lakestar +3
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • No account creation, email registration, or KYC verification required
  • Client-side architecture keeps private keys inside the local browser session
  • Free software with zero platform fees, relying only on donations
  • Backwards compatible with seed phrases from Trezor, Ledger, and Electrum
  • Zero platform commission fees charged on decentralized trades
  • No identity verification or KYC required to swap or store funds
  • Covers more than 10,000 assets across 48 native blockchains
  • Direct hardware wallet connectivity for Ledger and Tangem devices
Cons
  • Supports only the Bitcoin network and no other blockchains or tokens
  • Browser environments are susceptible to phishing and malicious web extensions
  • No built-in fiat on-ramp or decentralized swap functionality
  • Lacks direct hardware-wallet USB or Bluetooth signing integration
  • Third-party routing protocols and automated market makers impose variable swap fees and spreads
  • Cross-chain execution risks depend entirely on third-party bridge and DEX contract security
  • Users bear total responsibility for managing unassisted seed-phrase recovery
  • Trustpilot average rating stood at 3.0 out of 5 in March 2026
Best forQuick web-based Bitcoin transactions, Users avoiding KYC verification, Connecting via Tor browserKYC-free cross-chain asset swaps, Multichain DeFi asset management, Hardware wallet integration users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.