Binance.US vs WhiteBIT

How Binance.US vs WhiteBIT compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.1/53.7/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees5.03.5
Security & trust4.04.0
Asset selection4.03.5
Ease of use4.04.0
Support3.53.5
Specs
MarketsSpot, OTCSpot, Futures, Copy trading
Maker fee0%Not disclosed
Taker fee0.02%Not disclosed
Coins listed200Not disclosed
Fiat deposit methodsBank transfer, Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, ACHBank transfer, Card, SEPA
KYC required Yes Yes
Accepts US customers Yes No
Proof of reserves YesNot disclosed
Staking / earn Yes Yes
Mobile app YesNot disclosed
Licenses & registrationsFinCEN MSB, 32 US State Money Transmitter LicensesAustria FMA MiCA License, National Bank of Georgia Broker License
Security featuresU.S.-based cold storage, Multi-factor authentication, SOC 2 Type II certified, ISO 27001 certified, ISO 27701 certifiedAPI key IP whitelisting, Segregated sub-accounts
Futures & perpetuals No Yes
Copy trading No Yes
P2P market NoNot disclosed
Earn / savings products Yes Yes
User protection fund NoNot disclosed
Referral program Yes Yes
Company
Founded20192018
HeadquartersUnited StatesLithuania
InvestorsRRE Ventures, Circle Ventures, Foundation Capital, Original Capital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • 0% maker fees across all 250+ spot trading pairs
  • Zero-fee fiat deposits and withdrawals through bank ACH transfers
  • SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 third-party security audits
  • Staking support across 25+ proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies
  • Holds a MiCA license from the Austrian Financial Market Authority
  • Direct EUR deposits and payouts supported via SEPA
  • Segregated sub-account architecture for institutional lending and trading
  • MCP server and CLI for terminal-based and programmatic trading
Cons
  • Unavailable to residents in 16 U.S. jurisdictions, including New York and Texas
  • ACH fiat deposits carry a mandatory 7-day withdrawal hold
  • Centralized custody model requires full trust in the exchange for fund safety
  • Mandatory KYC identity verification required before trading or depositing
  • Does not accept customers from the US, the UK, or Canada
  • Centralized custody exposes funds to counterparty risk
  • Derivatives are not covered under its EEA MiCA authorization
  • No public testnet sandbox for testing API integrations
Best forU.S. spot traders placing limit orders, Investors seeking zero-fee ACH deposits, Proof-of-stake crypto holders earning rewardsEEA residents trading spot with euros, Institutional partners needing sub-account APIs, Traders using AI automation tools

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.