Binance.US vs tZERO

How Binance.US vs tZERO compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
tZERO3.4/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.1/53.4/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees5.03.0
Security & trust4.04.5
Asset selection4.02.5
Ease of use4.03.0
Support3.53.5
Specs
MarketsSpot, OTCSpot, OTC
Maker fee0%Not disclosed
Taker fee0.02%Not disclosed
Coins listed200Not disclosed
Fiat deposit methodsBank transfer, Card, Apple Pay, Google Pay, ACHNot disclosed
KYC required Yes Yes
Accepts US customers Yes Yes
Proof of reserves YesNot disclosed
Staking / earn Yes No
Mobile app YesNot disclosed
Licenses & registrationsFinCEN MSB, 32 US State Money Transmitter LicensesSEC-registered Broker-Dealer and ATS, SEC-registered Transfer Agent, FINRA Member, CFTC-registered DCO
Security featuresU.S.-based cold storage, Multi-factor authentication, SOC 2 Type II certified, ISO 27001 certified, ISO 27701 certifiedInstitutional key management, Regulated custody, API authentication
Futures & perpetuals No Yes
Copy trading No No
P2P market No No
Earn / savings products Yes No
User protection fund NoNot disclosed
Referral program YesNot disclosed
Company
Founded20192014
HeadquartersUnited StatesUnited States
InvestorsRRE Ventures, Circle Ventures, Foundation Capital, Original Capital +1Intercontinental Exchange (ICE)
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • 0% maker fees across all 250+ spot trading pairs
  • Zero-fee fiat deposits and withdrawals through bank ACH transfers
  • SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 third-party security audits
  • Staking support across 25+ proof-of-stake cryptocurrencies
  • Operates an SEC-registered and FINRA-member broker-dealer alternative trading system
  • Holds CFTC approval as a Derivatives Clearing Organization for derivatives clearing
  • Licensed to custody tokenized securities using its own wallet and key infrastructure
  • Backed by New York Stock Exchange parent company Intercontinental Exchange
Cons
  • Unavailable to residents in 16 U.S. jurisdictions, including New York and Texas
  • ACH fiat deposits carry a mandatory 7-day withdrawal hold
  • Centralized custody model requires full trust in the exchange for fund safety
  • Mandatory KYC identity verification required before trading or depositing
  • Strict KYC and accreditation requirements restrict retail and anonymous trading
  • Does not support standard spot trading for broad retail cryptocurrency pairs
  • Custody model relies on centralized broker-dealer safekeeping rather than self-custody
  • Secondary trading liquidity remains limited relative to major crypto exchanges
Best forU.S. spot traders placing limit orders, Investors seeking zero-fee ACH deposits, Proof-of-stake crypto holders earning rewardsUS accredited tokenized securities investors, Institutions needing FIX-connected clearing rails, Issuers listing real-world assets compliantly

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.