B2Broker vs EDX Markets

How B2Broker vs EDX Markets compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/53.1/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees3.53.0
Security & trust4.54.0
Asset selection4.52.5
Ease of use4.02.5
Support4.53.0
Specs
MarketsSpot, Margin, Copy trading, OTCSpot, Futures
Fiat deposit methodsBank transfer, CardNot disclosed
KYC required Yes Yes
Accepts US customersNot disclosed Yes
Staking / earnNot disclosed No
Mobile appNot disclosed No
Licenses & registrationsMauritius FSC, CySEC, NBRBNot disclosed
Security featuresNot disclosedBankruptcy-remote accounts, Central clearinghouse, Third-party custodian integration
Futures & perpetuals Yes Yes
Max leverage (x)1,0005
Copy trading Yes No
P2P marketNot disclosed No
Earn / savings productsNot disclosed No
User protection fundNot disclosed Yes
Referral programNot disclosed No
Company
Founded20142022
Headquarters—United States
InvestorsNot disclosedSBI Holdings
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Turnkey liquidity across 11 asset classes and 1,500 instruments via single margin
  • Stablecoin settlements in USDT and USDC across 10 separate blockchains
  • Regulated operating arms hold CySEC and Mauritius FSC licenses
  • Established track record since 2014 with over 500 broker launches
  • Centrally cleared model eliminates direct counterparty credit risk between participants
  • Non-custodial architecture lets institutions use their choice of custodian
  • Bankruptcy-remote member accounts protect customer assets from venue insolvency
  • Backed by major traditional financial institutions and a $76M Series C round
Cons
  • Does not accept retail traders or individual investor accounts
  • Requires corporate counterparty clearing through distinct legal entities
  • High leverage up to 1:1000 is restricted to unregulated jurisdictions
  • Restricted to institutional entities with no retail trading access
  • EDX Derivatives is unavailable to firms in the US, EU, UK, and Singapore
  • Derivatives leverage capped at 5x, lower than retail offshore venues
  • Requires comprehensive institutional onboarding and strict KYC verification
Best forBrokers launching white-label crypto exchanges, Institutional desks needing multi-asset liquidity, Firms operating cTrader prop trading programsInstitutional digital asset trading firms, Banks and market makers, Brokers seeking white-label clearing infrastructure

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons