B2Broker vs Digital Asset Management

How B2Broker vs Digital Asset Management compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.

Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/53.5/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees3.52.5
Security & trust4.54.5
Asset selection4.53.0
Ease of use4.03.5
Support4.53.5
Specs
MarketsSpot, Margin, Copy trading, OTCSpot, OTC
Fiat deposit methodsBank transfer, CardBank transfer
KYC required YesNot disclosed
Licenses & registrationsMauritius FSC, CySEC, NBRBGibraltar Financial Services Commission DLT Provider Licence, Malta Financial Services Authority CASP licence under MiCA, , Malta Financial Services Authority Payment Institution autho
Security featuresNot disclosedAML screening, Sanctions screening, Custody infrastructure, IP whitelisting, Token expiry and rotation
Futures & perpetuals Yes No
Max leverage (x)1,000Not disclosed
Copy trading Yes No
P2P marketNot disclosed No
Earn / savings productsNot disclosed No
Company
Founded20142017
Headquarters—Gibraltar
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Turnkey liquidity across 11 asset classes and 1,500 instruments via single margin
  • Stablecoin settlements in USDT and USDC across 10 separate blockchains
  • Regulated operating arms hold CySEC and Mauritius FSC licenses
  • Established track record since 2014 with over 500 broker launches
  • Licensed under the Gibraltar DLT framework since 2017
  • Authorised as a MiCA CASP by the Malta Financial Services Authority
  • Dedicated EUR IBANs and stablecoin conversion
  • Supports multiple chains including Bitcoin, EVM networks, Tron, and Solana
Cons
  • Does not accept retail traders or individual investor accounts
  • Requires corporate counterparty clearing through distinct legal entities
  • High leverage up to 1:1000 is restricted to unregulated jurisdictions
  • Not available to United States entities or retail consumers
  • No public retail spot order book or margin trading
  • Pricing terms are contractual rather than fixed on a public schedule
  • Requires mandatory corporate KYC and identity verification
Best forBrokers launching white-label crypto exchanges, Institutional desks needing multi-asset liquidity, Firms operating cTrader prop trading programsInstitutional stablecoin cross-border payments, EEA firms needing MiCA-aligned infrastructure, High-volume OTC crypto-fiat settlement

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons