B2Broker vs CoinEx Exchange

How B2Broker vs CoinEx Exchange compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/53.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Fees3.53.5
Security & trust4.52.5
Asset selection4.54.0
Ease of use4.03.5
Support4.53.5
Specs
MarketsSpot, Margin, Copy trading, OTCSpot, Futures, Margin
Fiat deposit methodsBank transfer, CardCard
KYC required YesNot disclosed
Accepts US customersNot disclosed No
Proof of reservesNot disclosed Yes
Staking / earnNot disclosed Yes
Mobile appNot disclosed Yes
Licenses & registrationsMauritius FSC, CySEC, NBRBEstonia FIU crypto operating license, Poland VASP
Security featuresNot disclosed2FA, Cold storage segregation, Anti-phishing code, Device management, Risk reserve fund
Futures & perpetuals Yes Yes
Max leverage (x)1,000Not disclosed
Copy trading Yes No
P2P marketNot disclosed No
Earn / savings productsNot disclosed Yes
User protection fundNot disclosed Yes
Referral programNot disclosed Yes
Company
Founded20142017
Headquarters—Seychelles
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Turnkey liquidity across 11 asset classes and 1,500 instruments via single margin
  • Stablecoin settlements in USDT and USDC across 10 separate blockchains
  • Regulated operating arms hold CySEC and Mauritius FSC licenses
  • Established track record since 2014 with over 500 broker launches
  • Published monthly proof of reserves verification reports
  • AMM liquidity pools let users earn shares of trading fees
  • Licensed as an operating exchange in Estonia and registered in Poland
  • Wide asset selection spanning hundreds of spot and perpetual markets
Cons
  • Does not accept retail traders or individual investor accounts
  • Requires corporate counterparty clearing through distinct legal entities
  • High leverage up to 1:1000 is restricted to unregulated jurisdictions
  • Permanently barred from operating in the United States
  • Suffered a $54 million hot wallet exploit in September 2023
  • Fiat on-ramps require third-party providers with external fee structures
  • No registration or licensing in the United Kingdom, Australia, or Japan
Best forBrokers launching white-label crypto exchanges, Institutional desks needing multi-asset liquidity, Firms operating cTrader prop trading programsNon-US altcoin traders, Perpetual futures and margin traders, Users providing AMM liquidity

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons