B2Broker vs Bitstamp
How B2Broker vs Bitstamp compare on our ratings, exchange specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 4.2/5 | 3.4/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Fees | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Security & trust | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Asset selection | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Ease of use | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Support | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Markets | Spot, Margin, Copy trading, OTC | Spot, Futures, OTC |
| Maker fee | Not disclosed | 0.3% |
| Taker fee | Not disclosed | 0.4% |
| Coins listed | Not disclosed | 115 |
| Fiat deposit methods | Bank transfer, Card | Not disclosed |
| KYC required | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Accepts US customers | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Proof of reserves | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Staking / earn | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Mobile app | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Licenses & registrations | Mauritius FSC, CySEC, NBRB | NYDFS BitLicense, CSSF Luxembourg authorization, FCA UK authorization, MAS Singapore authorization, EU MiCA CASP authorization |
| Security features | Not disclosed | 1:1 customer funds custody, Annual audits, Proof of reserves |
| Futures & perpetuals | Yes | Yes |
| Max leverage (x) | 1,000 | Not disclosed |
| Copy trading | Yes | Not disclosed |
| Earn / savings products | Not disclosed | Yes |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2014 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | — | Luxembourg |
| Investors | Not disclosed | Robinhood Markets, Pantera Capital |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Brokers launching white-label crypto exchanges, Institutional desks needing multi-asset liquidity, Firms operating cTrader prop trading programs | EU perpetual futures traders, Institutional trading desks, High-volume spot traders |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.